Join 2016 SEG EUROPE HONORARY LECTURER, Michel Kemper for Tuesday's London Evening lecture
Infusing Rock Physics into Seismic Inversion
With Michel A.C. Kemper,
2016 SEG EUROPE HONORARY LECTURER
Mick Jagger, philosopher and singer of The Rolling Stones back in 1969, sang rather pessimistically “You can’t always get what you want.” These words should ring true to all geoscientists: What we really want are measures of rock properties (such as facies/rock types, porosity, saturation, etc.), but what we typically measure in the field are quantities like resistivity, density, seismic wiggles, etc., —signals that are “some-how” related (to a smaller or larger degree) to these desired rock properties.
Obtaining profiles of rock properties from measured well logs is called petrophysical evaluation. Geologists, when they want to obtain estimates of overpressures, talk about prediction. Geophysicists, trying to obtain 3D images of rock properties from processed 3D seismic data, have a perhaps better, more formal name for this process: inversion.
Seismic inversion is a difficult endeavour, for the simple reason that the earth filters out a lot of the useful signal as it travels from a source through the subsurface to the receivers. What we are left with is a band-limited signal with restricted information content. This can be readily seen when we compare a seismic trace against a corresponding impedance profile: The latter typically becomes larger as we go deeper (compaction hardens the earth), whereas the former keeps wiggling around zero. What a mismatch!
Even though the new broadband seismic acquisition technique increases the seismic information content (good!), the signal is still band-limited, and keeps wiggling around zero. Thus, the mismatch with the harden-ing impedance profile is still there.
In that same song, Jagger also sings of a more optimistic moment: “If you try sometimes, you might find … you get what you need!” — a sentiment I wholeheartedly agree with. Seismic inversion may be difficult, and the information content of the seismic signal may be limited, but there are ever more sophisticated ways to perform seismic inversion, and that is what this lecture is all about.
The trick really is that somehow we need to add information to the seismic inversion process that is not in the seismic itself. For instance, low-frequency information (as the seismic is band-limited), or high-frequency information (for the same reason). Much of this lecture is about adding this extra information, because there are many ways to do this, though not all equally successful. We shall focus specifically on using rock-physics models to better derive the extra information, because these are nothing other than relationships between what we get and what we want!
Just to put the reader’s mind (and ears) at ease: I shall not be singing during the lecture.
The Geological Society of London
Tuesday 12 January, 6pm
Coming to Aberdeen in May 2016!